The Editors will provide assistance to authors and readers in order to improve the journal’s content and will respond promptly to any complaints and...
Expert Journals and its Editors are fully committed to promoting and practicing ethical publication practices. Expert Journals encourages integrity in research, writing, and peer review in the publishing process.
Responsabilities of Editors
The Editors are responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published based on the content of the article and...
The Editors will at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious...
The Editors and any editorial staff will not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author...
Responsabilities of Authors
Authors who submit manuscripts to Expert Journals warrant the following aspects: The manuscript reflects original work; The sent paper should not be...
A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements...
Please take note that we examine all submitted papers for plagiarism and check for resemblances and similitudes to existing published papers...
Every paper that has an influence on the current empirical or theoretical manuscript sent to Expert Journals should be referenced and cited...
Contributors who do not qualify as authors in terms of studying the data or developing the concepts, but have provided support should be listed in an...
When authors submit a manuscript, they should disclose any conflicts of interests, such as financial and personal relationships that might bias their...
In general, Expert Journals recommend that authors, who seek to publish private information and images of individuals, should obtain the individual’s...
Read How to handle authorship disputes: a guide for new researchers on the COPE website
Responsabilities of Reviewers
The Reviewer has an important role of assisting the Editors in making editorial decisions and the Author in improving his/her/their paper.
The Reviewer is expected to provide their review of the article in a timeframe of 1-2 months. If any selected referee will not be able to comply to...
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with other people.
Reviews should be conducted objectively and the referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers
COPE Flowchart: What to do if editors suspect a reviewer has appropriated an author’s idea or data
Responsabilities of Publisher
In matters of establishing the responsibilities of the publisher, Expert Journals subscribes to COPE’s Code of Conduct for Journal Publishers
The Reviewer has an important role of assisting the Editors in making editorial decisions and the Author in improving his/her/their paper.
Establish the policies necessary to help the editorial process of journal Editors, especially those related to the independence of Editors, research...
COPE’s Code of Conduct for Journal Publishers Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing Flowcharts Retraction Policy...